The
contemporary blur.
With the
constant churning out of temporary ideals portrayed to the youth of today, how
is any subculture able to stabilize and define itself?
‘local’
has diminished; communication has become globalized with the catalyst of the Internet.
Documentation of the new is aiding in its destruction. Styles are no longer
contained in a local area; photography on the Internet has destroyed all sense
of community.
Fashion being
used as a mode of expression has diminished;
Fashion has
the intention of portraying a selection of personal attributes, but we have to
question how can clothing be defined and categorized enough to be recognized to
portray a specific ideology any longer. Expressions of interests, personalities
and beliefs are decreasingly less communicated through ones attire, fashion has
become less true in the sense that it has become a shallow, purely aesthetical
declaration of, primarily, wealth. The concept of bearing logos and using the
beliefs and ideologies of a brand could be interpreted as the signifier of the
emptiness and the mindlessness of contemporary youth.
Social
media can be seen as the platform that houses contemporary subcultures, if
there are to be any. A transition from reality to a digital world is a dark thought.
Secret groups dealing in vintage clothing; artifacts of past subcultures, can
be seen as a metaphor for our contemporary blur, a merge of what once was,
keeping and idolizing the aesthetic, yet loosing the original ideology; A
subculture is, after all, more than fashion.
There
are aesthetic reminiscent of subcultures but have we lost the way of the
thinking that can create a movement. Looking beyond fashion and music, are
there any reminiscent of the security, belonging and devotion that were once found
in subculture; or have these desires become satisfied with soulless digital
replacements.
It
appears subcultures have become censored, stripped of the original conceptual
approach that defines them and robbed of the aesthetic that was used to convey
such ideas. This stolen aesthetic is diluted to fit into mainstream society,
appropriated by mainstream fashion to please a flock of followers.
A contemporary
interpretation of a subculture is the ‘Hipster’, a hollow description in which
90% of today’s youth can fit into. Anyone who shares a sense of creativeness,
absurdity or re-appropriation can be assumed to be a hipster.
We don’t
experience the clashing of subcultures, the glamourizing imagery of everyday
people fighting for escapism on a beach. We glamourize temporaries for their
aesthetic.
We are
the blur, re-appropriating the past but moving too quickly to settle, we are in
awe of past subcultures, placing them in a contemporary context, it is unconceivable
to imagine similar today.
No comments:
Post a Comment